Every organization isalready an intelligence.It's just an extremely slow one.
Your company's truth is scattered across repos, deals, calendars and inboxes — each system telling the truth, collectively wrong. Qwiri holds the full working state, reasons across all of it at once, and tells you what is true. With citations.
Nothing is broken. Every system is telling the truth. That's exactly the problem.
We've felt this. The deal says one thing, the repo says another, the calendar doesn't know either of them exists. No single tool you run today would catch it — because no single tool can see all three facts at once.
Sold on the 11th. Demo booked for the 27th. Nothing built for eleven days. Read separately, nothing triggers an alert anywhere. Read together, the gap is unmissable.
Silent drift
What was promised, what was scheduled and what was built diverge quietly. Each system is internally consistent and collectively wrong. The gap surfaces at the client — never internally.
Answer latency
Questions whose answers already exist in your own data take hours or days, because they need the right human in the right timezone. Meetings are the current technology for organizational state reconciliation.
Duplicated work
Two teams build the same thing because neither could see the other. AI made building cheap enough that this is now routine rather than embarrassing — and nobody is measuring the cost.
Intelligence that does not accumulate is not intelligence.
Most software is exactly as capable on day 1000 as on day 1. Qwiri's floor rises every day it runs — and that is the only part a competitor cannot copy in a quarter.
Connect
A source comes online. Raw events land as immutable facts — an actor, an action, a timestamp. Nothing summarized, because a summary is where provenance goes to die.
Resolve
The system works out what those facts refer to. This repo builds that product. That product is what was sold to that account. Done once per entity, not once per query.
Answer
You ask. Retrieval runs inside your permission scope, reasons across sources, and returns an answer with citations and timestamps.
Correct
A human who knows says otherwise. Confirmations, dismissals, fixes — the highest-quality signal the system will ever receive.
Retain
The correction is written back permanently. The next person asking a related question inherits it. Nobody fixes the same thing twice.
Connect → Resolve → Answer → Correct → Retain → Connect
Three surfaces. One organization graph underneath.
Ask anything. Get what's true.
Natural language across every connected source — code, commerce, calendar, conversation. Not links to read: the answer, with the reasoning attached.
- Every answer cited with source, timestamp and link
- Uncertainty stated in one line — never smoothed over
- Permission-scoped invisibly: two people, same question, different correct answers
A proposal including the cortex integration was sent on 11 Aug. The repo's last commit was 10 Aug, 09:04 — no build activity since. The client demo is confirmed for 27 Aug.
Unconfirmed link: repo ↔ account is inferred — flagged, not hidden
Your organization notices its own contradictions.
Continuous detection across sources, before the gap surfaces at a client. Five classes at launch — each card shows the evidence, the confidence, and three actions.
- Commitment gap · Stale momentum · Duplicate effort
- Ownership vacuum · Silent scope change
- Confirm, dismiss or open in Ask — every decision teaches the graph
Commitment gap — Wells Fargo
Every Monday, this writes itself.
The organizational briefing, generated rather than written. What shipped — translated from commits into outcomes. What moved commercially. What is at risk. Segmented by role.
- An exec and an engineering lead get different resolutions of the same week
- Every line citable back to the record it came from
- Always current — rendered from the graph on read, never a stale snapshot
Not a vanity score. A measure of how ready your company is to decide. We measure decision readiness — not document completeness.
Organization IQ answers three questions instantly: how intelligent is Qwiri about your organization today, where are the gaps, and what should you connect next to make it smarter. A source earns weight by importance, freshness and the decision context it unlocks — another random PDF moves the needle far less than your CRM or your executive decision history.
72% · Senior — Qwiri can confidently support operational decisions across 6 of 8 functions. +8% to Director.
Readiness level: Senior
Based on source coverage, evidence quality, and cross-functional connectivity.
Leadership runs at 86% because strategy docs, board decks and decisions are connected. Legal sits at 43% — contracts, policies and legal decision history are missing.
Never just a number — the score always shows what is missing and what fixing it is worth.
These sources are already contributing — progress you can explain, not a black box.
Percentages shown are illustrative — the scoring framework ships with the product
Six levels of organizational intelligence. Every company sits on one rung today.
The measure: a company running Qwiri for two years should be able to do things a company running it for two weeks cannot. If not, we built a search box.
Reads the systems where work actually happens. Never asks for a status update.
OAuth, incremental sync, webhook-driven. Two connectors are enough to produce real value — and Qwiri only ever inherits the access you already hold. It never grants more.
Personal scope stays personal — projected facts, never artifacts
See what your company is contradicting itself about. This week.
Thirty minutes. Bring your hardest cross-system question — the one that currently takes three meetings to answer — and we'll show you what Qwiri catches.
For whom: founders, COOs and CTOs at 20–500 person companies.
What you keep: the drift report we generate from your connected sources.
What we never do: widen your permissions, or score your people. Attribution yes, evaluation no.